OCaml before 4.03.0 does not properly handle sign extensions, which allows remote attackers to conduct buffer overflow attacks or obtain sen
OCaml before 4.03.0 does not properly handle sign extensions, which allows remote attackers to conduct buffer overflow attacks or obtain sensitive information as demonstrated by a long string to the String.copy function.
- Published
- Jun 13, 2016
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 5.3% · 92th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-119
Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.
Report tools
Action score
38
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 36 / 40 · 9.1 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 2 / 30 · 5.3%
Affected systems
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| ocaml | ocaml | cpe:2.3:a:ocaml:ocaml |
| fedoraproject | fedora | cpe:2.3:o:fedoraproject:fedora |
| opensuse | opensuse | cpe:2.3:o:opensuse:opensuse |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- fedoraproject fedora24
- ocaml ocamlup to 4.02.3 inclusive
- opensuse opensuse13.2
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | ocaml | before 4.02.3-9 | 4.02.3-9 |
| Debian:7 | ocaml | before 3.12.1-4+deb7u1 | 3.12.1-4+deb7u1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | libguestfs | before 1:1.20.11-20.el6 | 1:1.20.11-20.el6 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | libguestfs-debuginfo | before 1:1.20.11-20.el6 | 1:1.20.11-20.el6 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | libguestfs-devel | before 1:1.20.11-20.el6 | 1:1.20.11-20.el6 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | libguestfs-java | before 1:1.20.11-20.el6 | 1:1.20.11-20.el6 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | libguestfs-java-devel | before 1:1.20.11-20.el6 | 1:1.20.11-20.el6 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | libguestfs-javadoc | before 1:1.20.11-20.el6 | 1:1.20.11-20.el6 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | libguestfs-tools | before 1:1.20.11-20.el6 | 1:1.20.11-20.el6 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | libguestfs-tools-c | before 1:1.20.11-20.el6 | 1:1.20.11-20.el6 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | ocaml | before 0:3.11.2-5.el6 | 0:3.11.2-5.el6 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | ocaml-camlp4 | before 0:3.11.2-5.el6 | 0:3.11.2-5.el6 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | ocaml-camlp4-devel | before 0:3.11.2-5.el6 | 0:3.11.2-5.el6 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | ocaml-debuginfo | before 0:3.11.2-5.el6 | 0:3.11.2-5.el6 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | ocaml-docs | before 0:3.11.2-5.el6 | 0:3.11.2-5.el6 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | ocaml-emacs | before 0:3.11.2-5.el6 | 0:3.11.2-5.el6 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | ocaml-labltk | before 0:3.11.2-5.el6 | 0:3.11.2-5.el6 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | ocaml-labltk-devel | before 0:3.11.2-5.el6 | 0:3.11.2-5.el6 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | ocaml-libguestfs | before 1:1.20.11-20.el6 | 1:1.20.11-20.el6 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | ocaml-libguestfs-devel | before 1:1.20.11-20.el6 | 1:1.20.11-20.el6 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | ocaml-ocamldoc | before 0:3.11.2-5.el6 | 0:3.11.2-5.el6 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | ocaml-runtime | before 0:3.11.2-5.el6 | 0:3.11.2-5.el6 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | ocaml-source | before 0:3.11.2-5.el6 | 0:3.11.2-5.el6 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | ocaml-x11 | before 0:3.11.2-5.el6 | 0:3.11.2-5.el6 |
+46
Same product
ocaml: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2018-9838The caml_ba_deserialize function in byterun/bigarray.c in the standard library in OCaml 4.06.0 has an integer overflow which, in situations 40Plan
- CVE-2017-9772Insufficient sanitisation in the OCaml compiler versions 4.04.0 and 4.04.1 allows external code to be executed with raised privilege in bina40Plan
- CVE-2026-28364In OCaml before 4.14.3 and 5.x before 5.4.1, a buffer over-read in Marshal deserialization (runtime/intern.c) enables remote code execution 31Monitor
- CVE-2017-9779OCaml compiler allows attackers to have unspecified impact via unknown vectors, a similar issue to CVE-2017-9772 "but with much less impact.31Monitor
- CVE-2026-34353In OCaml through 4.14.3, Bigarray.reshape allows an integer overflow, and resultant reading of arbitrary memory, when untrusted data is proc20Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| debian:ocaml | 4.02.3-9 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:ocaml | 0:4.01.0-22.7.el7_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:ocaml-camlp4 | 0:4.01.0-22.7.el7_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:ocaml-camlp4-devel | 0:4.01.0-22.7.el7_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:ocaml-compiler-libs | 0:4.01.0-22.7.el7_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:ocaml-debuginfo | 0:4.01.0-22.7.el7_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:ocaml-docs | 0:4.01.0-22.7.el7_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:ocaml-emacs | 0:4.01.0-22.7.el7_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:ocaml-labltk | 0:4.01.0-22.7.el7_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:ocaml-labltk-devel | 0:4.01.0-22.7.el7_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:ocaml-ocamldoc | 0:4.01.0-22.7.el7_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:ocaml-runtime | 0:4.01.0-22.7.el7_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:ocaml-source | 0:4.01.0-22.7.el7_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:ocaml | 4.02.1-3.4 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Software Development Kit 11 SP4 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-119 · Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory BufferCVSS vector
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Buffer Overflow via Environment VariablesCAPEC-10likelihood: High · High
- Overflow BuffersCAPEC-100likelihood: High · Very High
- Buffer ManipulationCAPEC-123likelihood: High · Very High
- Client-side Injection-induced Buffer OverflowCAPEC-14likelihood: Medium · High
- Filter Failure through Buffer OverflowCAPEC-24likelihood: High · High
- MIME ConversionCAPEC-42likelihood: High · High
- Overflow Binary Resource FileCAPEC-44likelihood: High · Very High
- Buffer Overflow via Symbolic LinksCAPEC-45likelihood: High · High
ATT&CK techniques
—
Noroxi analysis
No Noroxi analysis for this record yet
We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.
We use this product, ask for helpChange log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
- lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-May/184507.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-05/msg00081.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-09/msg00037.html
- rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2576.html
- rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0564.html
- rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0565.html
- www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/04/29/1
- www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/04/29/6
- www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linuxbulletinjul2016-3090544.html
- www.securityfocus.com/bid/89318
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:1296
- github.com/ocaml/ocaml/commit/659615c7b100a89eafe6253e7a5b9d84d0e8df74#diff-a97df53e3ebc59bb457191b496c90762
- security.gentoo.org/glsa/201702-15
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.