Skip to content
Noroxi
CVE-2015-0691· NVD / CVE Program· CNA cisco

A certain Cisco JAR file, as distributed in Cache Cleaner in Cisco Secure Desktop (CSD), allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary comman

A certain Cisco JAR file, as distributed in Cache Cleaner in Cisco Secure Desktop (CSD), allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted web site, aka Bug ID CSCup83001.

CriticalCVSS 9.3 · v2.0—No exploit No fix recorded
Published
Apr 16, 2015
Updated
Jun 16, 2026
EPSS
3.1% · 87th percentile
Follow this CVE

Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.

Report tools

JSON

Action score

38

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
37 / 40 · 9.3 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
1 / 30 · 3.1%

Affected systems

VendorProduct
ciscosecure desktop

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • cisco secure desktop3.0_base
  • cisco secure desktop3.1_base
  • cisco secure desktop3.1.0.31
  • cisco secure desktop3.1.1
  • cisco secure desktop3.1.1.45
  • cisco secure desktop3.2_base
  • cisco secure desktop3.2.0.136
  • cisco secure desktop3.2.1.103
  • cisco secure desktop3.2.1.126
  • cisco secure desktop3.3_base
  • cisco secure desktop3.3.0.118
  • cisco secure desktop3.3.0.151
  • cisco secure desktop3.4_base
  • cisco secure desktop3.4.0373
  • cisco secure desktop3.4.1108
  • cisco secure desktop3.4.2048
  • cisco secure desktop3.5_base
  • cisco secure desktop3.5.1077
  • cisco secure desktop3.5.2001
  • cisco secure desktop3.5.2003

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2011-0926A certain ActiveX control in CSDWebInstaller.ocx in Cisco Secure Desktop (CSD) does not properly verify the signature of an unspecified down
    39Monitor
  • CVE-2012-4655The WebLaunch feature in Cisco Secure Desktop before 3.6.6020 does not properly validate binaries that are received by the downloader proces
    38Monitor
  • CVE-2011-0925The CSDWebInstallerCtrl ActiveX control in CSDWebInstaller.ocx in Cisco Secure Desktop (CSD) allows remote attackers to download an unintend
    38Monitor
  • CVE-2010-0589The Web Install ActiveX control (CSDWebInstaller) in Cisco Secure Desktop (CSD) before 3.5.841 does not properly verify the signatures of do
    38Monitor
  • CVE-2006-5393Cisco Secure Desktop (CSD) does not require that the ClearPageFileAtShutdown (aka CCE-Winv2.0-407) registry value equals 1, which might allo
    22Monitor
  • CVE-2010-0440Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in +CSCOT+/translation in Cisco Secure Desktop 3.4.2048, and other versions before 3.5; as used in
    18Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

    If successful

    Confidentiality
    C · data can be read
    Integrity
    C · data or configuration can be modified
    Availability
    C · the service can be disrupted
    Attack complexity
    M
    Confidentiality impact
    C
    Integrity impact
    C
    Availability impact
    C

    CVSS vector

    AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C

    nvd-primary

    Root cause

    User input is inserted as text into a shell command. The shell may interpret special characters in the input as part of the command.

    A representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.

    Vulnerable

    ts
    const host = req.body.host;exec("ping -c 1 " + host, onResult);

    Fixed

    ts
    const host = req.body.host;if (!/^[a-z0-9.-]{1,253}$/i.test(host)) return res.sendStatus(400);execFile("ping", ["-c", "1", host], onResult);

    Noroxi analysis

    No Noroxi analysis for this record yet

    We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.

    We use this product, ask for help

    Change log

    No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.

    References

    Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.

    All records