Skip to content
Noroxi
CVE-2014-8080· NVD / CVE Program· CNA mitre

The REXML parser in Ruby 1.9.x before 1.9.3-p550, 2.0.x before 2.0.0-p594, and 2.1.x before 2.1.4 allows remote attackers to cause a denial

The REXML parser in Ruby 1.9.x before 1.9.3-p550, 2.0.x before 2.0.0-p594, and 2.1.x before 2.1.4 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via a crafted XML document, aka an XML Entity Expansion (XEE) attack.

MediumCVSS 5.0 · v2.0—No exploit Fix available
Published
Nov 3, 2014
Updated
Jun 16, 2026
EPSS
5.5% · 93th percentile
CWE
—
Follow this CVE

Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.

Report tools

JSON

Action score

22

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
20 / 40 · 5.0 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
2 / 30 · 5.5%

Affected systems

VendorProduct
opensuseopensuse
canonicalubuntu linux
ruby-langruby
redhatenterprise linux

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • canonical ubuntu linux12.04
  • canonical ubuntu linux14.04
  • canonical ubuntu linux14.10
  • opensuse opensuse12.3
  • opensuse opensuse13.1
  • redhat enterprise linux6.0
  • redhat enterprise linux7.0
  • ruby-lang rubyup to 1.9.3 inclusive
  • ruby-lang ruby1.9.3
  • ruby-lang ruby2.0.0
  • ruby-lang ruby2.1.1
  • ruby-lang ruby2.1.2
  • ruby-lang ruby2.1.3

Package-level exposure

OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.

EcosystemPackageAffected rangeFix
Debian:6.0ruby1.8before 1.8.7.302-2squeeze31.8.7.302-2squeeze3
Debian:6.0ruby1.9.1before 1.9.2.0-2+deb6u31.9.2.0-2+deb6u3
Debian:7ruby1.8before 1.8.7.358-7.1+deb7u21.8.7.358-7.1+deb7u2
Debian:7ruby1.9.1before 1.9.3.194-8.1+deb7u31.9.3.194-8.1+deb7u3
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientrubybefore 0:1.8.7.374-3.el6_60:1.8.7.374-3.el6_6
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientruby-debuginfobefore 0:1.8.7.374-3.el6_60:1.8.7.374-3.el6_6
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientruby-develbefore 0:1.8.7.374-3.el6_60:1.8.7.374-3.el6_6
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientruby-docsbefore 0:1.8.7.374-3.el6_60:1.8.7.374-3.el6_6
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientruby-irbbefore 0:1.8.7.374-3.el6_60:1.8.7.374-3.el6_6
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientruby-libsbefore 0:1.8.7.374-3.el6_60:1.8.7.374-3.el6_6
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientruby-rdocbefore 0:1.8.7.374-3.el6_60:1.8.7.374-3.el6_6
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientruby-ribefore 0:1.8.7.374-3.el6_60:1.8.7.374-3.el6_6
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientruby-staticbefore 0:1.8.7.374-3.el6_60:1.8.7.374-3.el6_6
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientruby-tcltkbefore 0:1.8.7.374-3.el6_60:1.8.7.374-3.el6_6
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientrubybefore 0:2.0.0.353-22.el7_00:2.0.0.353-22.el7_0
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientruby-debuginfobefore 0:2.0.0.353-22.el7_00:2.0.0.353-22.el7_0
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientruby-develbefore 0:2.0.0.353-22.el7_00:2.0.0.353-22.el7_0
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientruby-docbefore 0:2.0.0.353-22.el7_00:2.0.0.353-22.el7_0
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientruby-irbbefore 0:2.0.0.353-22.el7_00:2.0.0.353-22.el7_0
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientruby-libsbefore 0:2.0.0.353-22.el7_00:2.0.0.353-22.el7_0
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientruby-tcltkbefore 0:2.0.0.353-22.el7_00:2.0.0.353-22.el7_0
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientrubygem-bigdecimalbefore 0:1.2.0-22.el7_00:1.2.0-22.el7_0
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientrubygem-io-consolebefore 0:0.4.2-22.el7_00:0.4.2-22.el7_0
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientrubygem-jsonbefore 0:1.7.7-22.el7_00:1.7.7-22.el7_0

+68

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2013-4115Buffer overflow in the idnsALookup function in dns_internal.cc in Squid 3.2 through 3.2.11 and 3.3 through 3.3.6 allows remote attackers to
    43Plan
  • CVE-2015-7805Heap-based buffer overflow in libsndfile 1.0.25 allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact via the headindex value in the header in
    41Plan
  • CVE-2015-5957Buffer overflow in the DumpSysVar function in var.c in Remind before 3.1.15 allows attackers to have unspecified impact via a long name.
    41Plan
  • CVE-2008-2388Multiple off-by-one errors in opensuse-updater in openSUSE 10.2 have unspecified impact and attack vectors.
    40Plan
  • CVE-2016-2335The CInArchive::ReadFileItem method in Archive/Udf/UdfIn.cpp in 7zip 9.20 and 15.05 beta and p7zip allows remote attackers to cause a denial
    38Monitor
  • CVE-2016-1663The SerializedScriptValue::transferArrayBuffers function in WebKit/Source/bindings/core/v8/SerializedScriptValue.cpp in the V8 bindings in B
    35Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
debian:ruby1.81.8.7.302-2squeeze3 · Debian:6.0Package registry (OSV)
debian:ruby1.9.11.9.2.0-2+deb6u3 · Debian:6.0Package registry (OSV)
red hat:ruby0:1.8.7.374-3.el6_6 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:ruby-debuginfo0:1.8.7.374-3.el6_6 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:ruby-devel0:1.8.7.374-3.el6_6 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:ruby-docs0:1.8.7.374-3.el6_6 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:ruby-irb0:1.8.7.374-3.el6_6 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:ruby-libs0:1.8.7.374-3.el6_6 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:ruby-rdoc0:1.8.7.374-3.el6_6 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:ruby-ri0:1.8.7.374-3.el6_6 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:ruby-static0:1.8.7.374-3.el6_6 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:ruby-tcltk0:1.8.7.374-3.el6_6 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:rubygem-bigdecimal0:1.2.0-22.el7_0 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:rubygem-io-console0:0.4.2-22.el7_0 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientPackage registry (OSV)

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

The product’s vendor appears in a public program. Matched by name; verify the scope text in the program.

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality
none
Integrity
none
Availability
P · the service can be disrupted
Attack complexity
Low
Confidentiality impact
None
Integrity impact
None
Availability impact
P

Weakness class (CWE)

—

CVSS vector

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P

nvd-primary

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.

Noroxi analysis

No Noroxi analysis for this record yet

We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.

We use this product, ask for help

Change log

  1. Fix✗ → ✓

For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

References

All records