Skip to content
Noroxi
CVE-2014-0489· NVD / CVE Program· CNA debian

APT before 1.0.9, when the Acquire::GzipIndexes option is enabled, does not validate checksums, which allows remote attackers to execute arb

APT before 1.0.9, when the Acquire::GzipIndexes option is enabled, does not validate checksums, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted package.

HighCVSS 7.5 · v2.0—No exploit Fix available
Published
Nov 3, 2014
Updated
Jun 16, 2026
EPSS
3.6% · 89th percentile
Follow this CVE

Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.

Report tools

JSON

Action score

31

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
30 / 40 · 7.5 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
1 / 30 · 3.6%

Affected systems

VendorProduct
debianadvanced package tool

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • debian advanced package tool1.0.3
  • debian advanced package tool1.0.5
  • debian advanced package tool1.0.7

Package-level exposure

OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.

EcosystemPackageAffected rangeFix
Debian:12aptbefore 1.0.91.0.9
Debian:6.0aptbefore 0.8.10.3+squeeze30.8.10.3+squeeze3
Debian:7aptbefore 0.9.7.9+deb7u30.9.7.9+deb7u3

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2009-1358apt-get in apt before 0.7.21 does not check for the correct error code from gpgv, which causes apt to treat a repository as valid even when
    41Plan
  • CVE-2009-1300apt 0.7.20 does not check when the date command returns an "invalid date" error, which can prevent apt from loading security updates in time
    41Plan
  • CVE-2019-3462Incorrect sanitation of the 302 redirect field in HTTP transport method of apt versions 1.4.8 and earlier can lead to content injection by a
    36Monitor
  • CVE-2014-0490The apt-get download command in APT before 1.0.9 does not properly validate signatures for packages, which allows remote attackers to execut
    31Monitor
  • CVE-2014-0487APT before 1.0.9 does not verify downloaded files if they have been modified as indicated using the If-Modified-Since header, which has unsp
    31Monitor
  • CVE-2014-0488APT before 1.0.9 does not "invalidate repository data" when moving from an unauthenticated to authenticated state, which allows remote attac
    28Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
debian:apt1.0.9 · Debian:12Package registry (OSV)

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Noroxi analysis

No Noroxi analysis for this record yet

We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.

We use this product, ask for help

Change log

  1. Fix✗ → ✓

For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

References

Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.

All records