The web interface on the Axesstel MV 410R redirects users back to the referring page after execution of some CGI scripts, which makes it eas
The web interface on the Axesstel MV 410R redirects users back to the referring page after execution of some CGI scripts, which makes it easier for remote attackers to avoid detection of cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks, as demonstrated by a redirect from the cgi-bin/wireless.cgi script.
- Published
- Jul 5, 2009
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.8% · 56th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-352
Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.
Report tools
Action score
23
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 23 / 40 · 5.8 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.8%
Affected systems
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| axesstel | mv 410r | cpe:2.3:h:axesstel:mv_410r |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- axesstel mv 410rall versions
Same product
axesstel: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2009-2317The Axesstel MV 410R has a certain default administrator password, and does not force a password change, which makes it easier for remote at41Plan
- CVE-2009-2321cgi-bin/sysconf.cgi on the Axesstel MV 410R allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (configuration reset) via a RESTORE=RESTORE31Monitor
- CVE-2009-2318The Axesstel MV 410R allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a flood of SYN packets, a related issue to CVE-1999-0116.31Monitor
- CVE-2009-2320The web interface on the Axesstel MV 410R relies on client-side JavaScript code to validate input, which allows remote attackers to send cra30Monitor
- CVE-2009-2319The default configuration of the Wi-Fi component on the Axesstel MV 410R does not use encryption, which makes it easier for remote attackers20Monitor
- CVE-2009-2322Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in cgi-bin/sysconf.cgi on the Axesstel MV 410R allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web scri17Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- P · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- P · the service can be disrupted
- Attack complexity
- M
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- P
- Availability impact
- P
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-352 · Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)CVSS vector
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:P
nvd-primary
Root cause
State-changing requests rely on the session cookie the browser sends automatically; nothing verifies that the request came from the user’s own page.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-352 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
app.use(session({ cookie: { httpOnly: true } }));app.post("/account/address", updateAddress);Fixed
app.use(session({ cookie: { httpOnly: true, sameSite: "lax" } }));app.post("/account/address", csrfProtection, updateAddress);Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Noroxi analysis
No Noroxi analysis for this record yet
We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.
We use this product, ask for helpChange log
No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.