The getAnnots Doc method in the JavaScript API in Adobe Reader and Acrobat 9.1, 8.1.4, 7.1.1, and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a
The getAnnots Doc method in the JavaScript API in Adobe Reader and Acrobat 9.1, 8.1.4, 7.1.1, and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory corruption) or execute arbitrary code via a PDF file that contains an annotation, and has an OpenAction entry with JavaScript code that calls this method with crafted integer arguments.
- Published
- Apr 30, 2009
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 25.5% · 98th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-399
Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.
Report tools
Action score
45
Plan
Add it to your regular patch cycle.
- CVSS
- 37 / 40 · 9.3 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 8 / 30 · 25.5%
Affected systems
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| adobe | acrobat | cpe:2.3:a:adobe:acrobat |
| adobe | acrobat reader | cpe:2.3:a:adobe:acrobat_reader |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- adobe acrobat7.0 and later · up to 7.1.1 inclusive
- adobe acrobat8.0 and later · up to 8.1.4 inclusive
- adobe acrobat9.0 and later · up to 9.1 inclusive
- adobe acrobat reader7.0 and later · up to 7.1.1 inclusive
- adobe acrobat reader8.0 and later · up to 8.1.4 inclusive
- adobe acrobat reader9.0 and later · up to 9.1 inclusive
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat:rhel_extras:3 | acroread | before 0:8.1.5-2 | 0:8.1.5-2 |
| Red Hat:rhel_extras:3 | acroread-plugin | before 0:8.1.5-2 | 0:8.1.5-2 |
| Red Hat:rhel_extras:4 | acroread | before 0:8.1.5-1.el4 | 0:8.1.5-1.el4 |
| Red Hat:rhel_extras:4 | acroread-plugin | before 0:8.1.5-1.el4 | 0:8.1.5-1.el4 |
| Red Hat:rhel_extras:5::client | acroread | before 0:8.1.5-1.el5 | 0:8.1.5-1.el5 |
| Red Hat:rhel_extras:5::client | acroread-plugin | before 0:8.1.5-1.el5 | 0:8.1.5-1.el5 |
Same product
adobe: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2011-2462Unspecified vulnerability in the U3D component in Adobe Reader and Acrobat 10.1.1 and earlier on Windows and Mac OS X, and Adobe Reader 9.x KEV96Now
- CVE-2013-3346Adobe Reader and Acrobat 9.x before 9.5.5, 10.x before 10.1.7, and 11.x before 11.0.03 allow attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a KEV93Now
- CVE-2021-21017Acrobat Reader DC Heap-based Buffer Overflow Vulnerability Could Lead To Arbitrary Code ExecutionKEV91Now
- CVE-2009-3459Heap-based buffer overflow in Adobe Reader and Acrobat 7.x before 7.1.4, 8.x before 8.1.7, and 9.x before 9.2 allows remote attackers to exeKEV91Now
- CVE-2008-2992Stack-based buffer overflow in Adobe Acrobat and Reader 8.1.2 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a PDF file tKEV91Now
- CVE-2009-3953The U3D implementation in Adobe Reader and Acrobat 9.x before 9.3, 8.x before 8.2 on Windows and Mac OS X, and 7.x before 7.1.4 allows remotKEV90Now
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| red hat:acroread | 0:8.1.5-2 · Red Hat:rhel_extras:3 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:acroread-plugin | 0:8.1.5-2 · Red Hat:rhel_extras:3 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
Proof of concept available
A public proof of concept or detection signature exists. Exploit knowledge is out there; don't delay patching.
Evidence
- Exploit-DB entry ×1
Noroxi does not host or link to exploit code. Metasploit module names and Nuclei template ids are shown (names, not code); Exploit-DB entries and PoC repositories are given as counts only.
| Source | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Exploit-DB entry | remote | 2009-04-29 |
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
- First PoC-2 d
- Published
- TodaySep 30, 2026+6362 d
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
The product’s vendor appears in a public program. Matched by name; verify the scope text in the program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
If successful
- Confidentiality
- C · data can be read
- Integrity
- C · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- C · the service can be disrupted
- Attack complexity
- M
- Confidentiality impact
- C
- Integrity impact
- C
- Availability impact
- C
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-399 · Resource Management ErrorsCVSS vector
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Noroxi analysis
No Noroxi analysis for this record yet
We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.
We use this product, ask for helpChange log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
- blogs.adobe.com/psirt/2009/04/potential_adobe_reader_issue.html
- blogs.adobe.com/psirt/2009/04/update_on_adobe_reader_issue.html
- blogs.adobe.com/psirt/2009/05/adobe_reader_issue_update.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2009-05/msg00001.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2009-06/msg00003.html
- osvdb.org/54130
- secunia.com/advisories/34924
- secunia.com/advisories/35055
- secunia.com/advisories/35096
- secunia.com/advisories/35152
- secunia.com/advisories/35358
- secunia.com/advisories/35416
- secunia.com/advisories/35734
- security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-200907-06.xml
- sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1-66-259028-1
- support.nortel.com/go/main.jsp?cscat=BLTNDETAIL&id=926953
- www.adobe.com/support/security/bulletins/apsb09-06.html
- www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/970180
- www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2009-0478.html
- www.securitytracker.com/id?1022139
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.