Buffer overflow in the strip_html_tags method for Gyach Enhanced (Gyach-E) before 1.0.4 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service
Buffer overflow in the strip_html_tags method for Gyach Enhanced (Gyach-E) before 1.0.4 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service and possibly execute arbitrary code via unknown vectors involving HTML tags.
- Published
- Dec 31, 2004
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 2.4% · 83th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-119
Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.
Report tools
Action score
31
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 30 / 40 · 7.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 1 / 30 · 2.4%
Affected systems
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| phrozensmoke | gyach enhanced | cpe:2.3:a:phrozensmoke:gyach_enhanced |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- phrozensmoke gyach enhancedup to 1.0.3 inclusive
Same product
phrozensmoke: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2004-2710Multiple buffer overflows in Gyach Enhanced (Gyach-E) before 1.0.3 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly 31Monitor
- CVE-2004-2711Multiple buffer overflows in Gyach Enhanced (Gyach-E) before 1.0.2 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly 31Monitor
- CVE-2004-2707Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Gyach Enhanced (Gyach-E) before 1.0.5 have unknown impact and attack vectors related to "several sec30Monitor
- CVE-2004-2708Gyach Enhanced (Gyach-E) before 1.0.0 stores passwords in plaintext, which allows attackers to obtain user passwords by reading the configur20Monitor
- CVE-2004-2706Unspecified vulnerability in Gyach Enhanced (Gyach-E) before 1.0.4 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via conferen20Monitor
- CVE-2004-2712Buffer overflow in Gyach Enhanced (Gyach-E) before 1.0.0-SneakPeek-3 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via unspec20Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- P · data can be read
- Integrity
- P · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- P · the service can be disrupted
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Confidentiality impact
- P
- Integrity impact
- P
- Availability impact
- P
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-119 · Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory BufferCVSS vector
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Buffer Overflow via Environment VariablesCAPEC-10likelihood: High · High
- Overflow BuffersCAPEC-100likelihood: High · Very High
- Buffer ManipulationCAPEC-123likelihood: High · Very High
- Client-side Injection-induced Buffer OverflowCAPEC-14likelihood: Medium · High
- Filter Failure through Buffer OverflowCAPEC-24likelihood: High · High
- MIME ConversionCAPEC-42likelihood: High · High
- Overflow Binary Resource FileCAPEC-44likelihood: High · Very High
- Buffer Overflow via Symbolic LinksCAPEC-45likelihood: High · High
ATT&CK techniques
—
Noroxi analysis
No Noroxi analysis for this record yet
We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.
We use this product, ask for helpChange log
No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.